Search
Author

Seamus E. Byrne is an Australian Information Lawyer and Computer Forensics Expert with extensive e-discovery and electronic evidence experience.

Sponsored by Lion Forensic.

Subscribe (Free)

In Pursuit of Relevance is the leading e-discovery law blog for the Asia-Pacific.

Subscribe now and receive the latest blog entries via e-mail or RSS.

Blog Filter
Disclaimer

This website is made available by Seamus E. Byrne, an Australian legal practitioner, for educational purposes only. Content is not to be used as legal opinion or as a substitute to qualified matter-specific legal advisory within your jurisdiction. No responsibility is taken, or endorsement made, for the content of any externally hyperlinked webpage. All endeavours have been made to ensure content accuracy as at time of publication.

Administration
« Different Solutions Pty Ltd v Commissioner, AFP (No 2) [2008] FCA 1686 | Main | Leighton v Shire of Kalamunda [2008] WAICmr 52 »
Sunday
23Nov2008

NAK Australia Pty Ltd v Starkey Consulting Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1142

NAK Australia Pty Ltd v Starkey Consulting Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1142 (10 October 2008).

The recent ex tempore decision of Brereton J reinforces the ability of a party to challenge the authenticity of a relevant e-mail. Further, to seek orders for the appointment of an independent computer expert to facilitate inspection and/or production of the e-mail in its native (original) format.

 

Related Judgment

NAK Australia Pty Ltd v Starkey Consulting Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1136 (11 August 2008).

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.