Search
Author

Seamus E. Byrne is an Australian Information Lawyer and Computer Forensics Expert with extensive e-discovery and electronic evidence experience.

Sponsored by Lion Forensic.

Subscribe (Free)

In Pursuit of Relevance is the leading e-discovery law blog for the Asia-Pacific.

Subscribe now and receive the latest blog entries via e-mail or RSS.

Blog Filter
Disclaimer

This website is made available by Seamus E. Byrne, an Australian legal practitioner, for educational purposes only. Content is not to be used as legal opinion or as a substitute to qualified matter-specific legal advisory within your jurisdiction. No responsibility is taken, or endorsement made, for the content of any externally hyperlinked webpage. All endeavours have been made to ensure content accuracy as at time of publication.

Administration
« Law Society Journal, July 2008 - Obtaining Foreign Discovery | Main | Search Orders - Jemella Australia (No. 3) »
Monday
Jul142008

Proctor, July 2008 - eTrial Reflections in the Supreme Court of Queensland

In this month's Proctor, Sheryl Jackson, Associate Professor of Law at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) and fellow speaker at the recent VSCL Legal Technology Conference, provides an overview of her forthcoming paper in 'Court-provided trial presentation technology – the way of the future?'.

Professor Jackson surveyed the parties involved in the electronic trial (eTrial) for the proceeding (Covecorp Constructions Pty Ltd v Indigo Projects Pty Ltd (BS 10157/01; BS 2763/02), which settled during trial, and also obtained feedback from the judge, Justice Fryberg.

Key Points

  1. Courts, such as the Queensland Courts, are bridging 'the eTrial divide' by delivering affordable, useable and efficient electronic courtbook (eCourtbook) technology. Traditionally, legal practitioners were limited to a completely paper-based trial or the relatively daunting engagement of a third-party service provider to deliver an eTrial solution;
  2. Whilst difficult, parties should endeavour to identify whether a matter will proceed to trial, and where reasonably likely, agree upon an appropriate eTrial strategy at the earliest opportunity; and
  3. The Document Management Protocol for a proceeding must be appropriately detailed, and completely adhered to by all parties to ensure consistent indexing, searching and viewing (i.e. display) of documents, both paper and electronic, in the courtroom.

Cost?

Access to the eCourtbook technology and infrastructure is currently provided by Queensland Courts at no cost to the parties!

References (2)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (1)

Hi Seamus,

Do you have any references relating to NSW or Victorian trials that have gone down this path. I've noticed that Sheryl refers only to QLD.

Thanks

Doug.
July 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDoug Haselwood

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.