Search
Author

Seamus E. Byrne is an Australian Information Lawyer and Computer Forensics Expert with extensive e-discovery and electronic evidence experience.

Sponsored by Lion Forensic.

Subscribe (Free)

In Pursuit of Relevance is the leading e-discovery law blog for the Asia-Pacific.

Subscribe now and receive the latest blog entries via e-mail or RSS.

Blog Filter
Disclaimer

This website is made available by Seamus E. Byrne, an Australian legal practitioner, for educational purposes only. Content is not to be used as legal opinion or as a substitute to qualified matter-specific legal advisory within your jurisdiction. No responsibility is taken, or endorsement made, for the content of any externally hyperlinked webpage. All endeavours have been made to ensure content accuracy as at time of publication.

Administration
« LIV CPD, August 2008 - Discovery of Electronic Evidence | Main | LexisNexis - Federal Civil Litigation Precedents »
Tuesday
15Jul2008

VSCL LTC 2008 - Identification and Collection Methodologies for ESI

On 11 July 2008, I was pleased to present with Geoffrey Lambert (KordaMentha) on the topic of Identification and Collection Methodologies for Electronically Stored Information (ESI) at the Victorian Society for Computers and the Law (VSCL) Legal Technology Conference.

The session endeavoured to present a brief overview of practical strategy for the identification, preservation and collection stages of the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM).

Our presentation in Portable Document Format (PDF).

References (2)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    F-Response was recently mentioned in an excellent presentation by Seamus Byrne (eDiscovery Tools Inc ) and Geoffrey Lambert (KordaMentha ) at the July 11th Victorian Society for Computers and the Law (VSCL) Legal Technology Conference.
  • Related
    Just a few years ago, litigants were infrequently sanctioned for e-discovery failures, in part, because many judges gave litigants who botched e-discovery the benefit of the doubt and chalked up e-discovery mishaps to "the learning curve." Those days are over.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.