Computer Forensic Experts and Case-Relevant Expertise – Racing and Wagering Western Australia v Software AG
September 13, 2008 Racing and Wagering Western Australia v Software AG (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1332.
The recent decision of McKerracher J clarifies the position in relation to software licensing for Australian businesses that have implemented a 'mirrored' technology infrastructure as part of their disaster recovery processes. In dealing with a mainframe computing infrastructure, it also highlights the importance of a computer forensic expert possessing case-relevant expertise.
In considering expert evidence and apparent case-relevant expertise, His Honour noted that:
[183] In my opinion, there is no doubt that each of the three experts was doing his best to provide frank assistance but it is equally clear that Mr A’s views were not only entirely plausible but have the support of a substantial background experience in this specific industry.
[184] SAG’s expert, Mr B, has had limited experience in a mainframe computer environment. In comparison Mr A has worked for over 30 years in the mainframe industry and has worked at many of the organisations in Australia that operate mainframe computers.

Reader Comments