<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:11:16 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>In Pursuit of Relevance</title><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/</link><description>Seamus E. Byrne's - In Pursuit of Relevance</description><copyright>Copyright 2008, Seamus E. Byrne. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><language>en-AU</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Search Orders - Jemella Australia (No. 3)</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>Search Orders</category><category>Australia</category><category>Forensics</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/6/14/search-orders-jemella-australia-no-3.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1922978</guid><description><![CDATA[A wake up call for your Independent Computer Expert (ICE)?]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1922978.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Electronic Litigation in Australian Courts - Current Practice Landscape</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>NSWSC</category><category>Australia</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/6/7/electronic-litigation-in-australian-courts-current-practice.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1893689</guid><description><![CDATA[With the forthcoming revision to Practice Note 17 in the Federal Court, please find a listing of practice guidelines (i.e. notes and directions) which form the current landscape for electronic discovery, and wider electronic litigation in Australian courts.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1893689.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>ALSP Update, June 2008 - Furinzic Stuff for Food?</title><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Forensics</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/6/6/alsp-update-june-2008-furinzic-stuff-for-food.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1891614</guid><description><![CDATA["I asked several industry veterans what they would suggest to a friend who was deciding which vendor to use for e-Discovery or digital forensics, assuming there was some reason the friend could not use the veteran."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1891614.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Redaction of Document Content for eDiscovery</title><category>E-Discovery</category><category>EDRM - Production</category><category>PDF</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/6/5/redaction-of-document-content-for-ediscovery.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1814708</guid><description><![CDATA[Many software utilities are available to create Portable Document Format (PDF) documents and Adobe® Acrobat® is arguably the most popular utility for this purpose.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1814708.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Digital Forensic Investigations - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</title><category>Conferences</category><category>Asia</category><category>Forensics</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/5/9/digital-forensic-investigations-kuala-lumpur-malaysia.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1826331</guid><description><![CDATA[On 8-9 May 2008, I presented a platform on Digital Forensic Investigations to a number of senior investigators and intelligence officials from government, banking and publicly-listed public sector organisations.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1826331.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Revised Expert Witness Guidelines in the Federal Court of Australia</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>Expert Evidence</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/5/6/revised-expert-witness-guidelines-in-the-federal-court-of-au.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1830627</guid><description><![CDATA[On 5 May 2008, Chief Justice Black issued an update to the existing Practice Direction: 'Guidelines for Expert Witnesses in Proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia'.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1830627.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>CEIC 2008 - International eDiscovery</title><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Conferences</category><category>United States</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/4/30/ceic-2008-international-ediscovery.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1808150</guid><description><![CDATA[On 29 April 2008, I was pleased to present on the topic of International eDiscovery at the Computer and Enterprise Investigations Conference (CEIC), held in picturesque Lake Las Vegas.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1808150.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Disputing Protocols for the Electronic Exchange of Discoverable Documents in the Federal Court of Australia</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Document Management Protocols</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/3/31/disputing-protocols-for-the-electronic-exchange-of-discovera.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1808300</guid><description><![CDATA[The Federal Court recently made orders in two (2) similar, yet separate, cases where disputes arose over the application of a document management protocol (protocol) to facilitate the electronic exchange of discoverable documents.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1808300.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Search (Anton Piller) Orders and Electronically Stored Information (ESI) in the Federal Court of Australia</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>Conferences</category><category>Search Orders</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/3/16/search-anton-piller-orders-and-electronically-stored-informa.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1809975</guid><description><![CDATA[As the only other lawyer and computer forensic expert in Australia, Geoffrey Lambert (Director, KordaMentha) and I are fortunate enough to be regularly requested to educate practitioners on a variety of topics pertaining to electronic evidence.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1809975.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Reasonable Searches for Electronic Documents and E-mail in the Federal Court of Australia (Incomplete)</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Reasonable Search</category><category>EDRM - Identification</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2008/3/1/reasonable-searches-for-electronic-documents-and-e-mail-in-t.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:1556354</guid><description><![CDATA[A widely debated issue for those involved in the Federal Court's recent consultative drafting process for a replacement to Practice Note 17 (20 April 2000) was whether the concept of 'making a reasonable search' should be specifically revised to deal with electronically stored information (ESI).]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-1556354.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>