<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:38:54 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>In Pursuit of Relevance</title><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/</link><description>Seamus E. Byrne's - In Pursuit of Relevance</description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright>Copyright 2008, Seamus E. Byrne. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><language>en-AU</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Media Report - Government opens doors for export of personal data</title><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Privacy</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:29:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/11/3/media-report-government-opens-doors-for-export-of-personal-d.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:5679404</guid><description><![CDATA["Australian governments of all persuasions stress how essential border security is in many fields, such as immigration, narcotics and quarantine, but the Rudd government is proposing to abandon any border protection of personal information."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-5679404.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Real eDiscovery, Fall 2009 - The Australian eDiscovery Landscape</title><category>Australia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Publications</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:25:10 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/10/1/real-ediscovery-fall-2009-the-australian-ediscovery-landscap.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:5351945</guid><description><![CDATA[Experts Geoffrey Lambert and Seamus E. Byrne provide insights regarding the Australian eDiscovery landscape.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-5351945.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Chief Justice Martin on Discovery</title><category>Australia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Western Australia</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:03:48 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/10/1/chief-justice-martin-on-discovery.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:5347845</guid><description><![CDATA["The expense involved in discovery can be horrendous."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-5347845.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Federal Court of Australia re-issues PN 17</title><category>Australia</category><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:46:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/9/25/federal-court-of-australia-re-issues-pn-17.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:5292590</guid><description><![CDATA[The Federal Court of Australia has re-issued Practice Note 17 as PN CM 6.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-5292590.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>LexisNexis e-Discovery &amp; Digital Forensics Conference - Hong Kong, 2009</title><category>Asia</category><category>China</category><category>Computer Forensics</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Hong Kong</category><category>Japan</category><category>Singapore</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:48:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/9/10/lexisnexis-e-discovery-digital-forensics-conference-hong-kon.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:5148617</guid><description><![CDATA[On 20-21 July 2009, I was pleased to serve as the Chairperson of the inaugural LexisNexis e-Discovery & Digital Forensics Conference, held at the Renaissance Harbour View Hotel in Hong Kong.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-5148617.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Supreme Court of Singapore's new Practice Direction 3 of 2009</title><category>Asia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Singapore</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:31:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/8/3/supreme-court-of-singapores-new-practice-direction-3-of-2009.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4808650</guid><description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Singapore has released Practice Direction 3 of 2009 dealing with the "Discovery and Inspection of Electronically Stored Documents" (PD 3/2009).]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4808650.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Media Report - Legal team rebuked for 'trolley-load litigation'</title><category>Media Reports</category><category>New South Wales</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:08:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/7/18/media-report-legal-team-rebuked-for-trolley-load-litigation.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4666444</guid><description><![CDATA["A SUPREME Court judge has delivered a rare and costly rebuke to a Sydney legal team for "trolley-load litigation", a sin that experts say is widespread in our courts but almost impossible to stop."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4666444.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Media Report - Courts get a friendly makeover</title><category>Media Reports</category><category>New South Wales</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/7/13/media-report-courts-get-a-friendly-makeover.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4599805</guid><description><![CDATA["IF HELL has harbour views, as a Sydney lawyer once noted, why shouldn't the highest courts in the land? They will now, as the NSW Government commits $69 million for the upgrade of the oft-maligned Law Courts building in Queens Square."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4599805.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>First Look - Access to Justice (Civil Litigation Reforms) Amendment Bill 2009</title><category>Australia</category><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>Legislation</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:47:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/6/23/first-look-access-to-justice-civil-litigation-reforms-amendm.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4408032</guid><description><![CDATA[Attorney-General Robert McClelland has presented a Bill for "an Act to amend legislation relating to federal courts, and for related purposes."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4408032.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Discovery under the Supreme Court of Victoria's new Practice Note 2/2009 (TEC List)</title><category>Australia</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>Victoria</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/6/19/discovery-under-the-supreme-court-of-victorias-new-practice.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4371668</guid><description><![CDATA[Chief Justice Warren has issued the Supreme Court of Victoria's new Practice Note 2 of 2009. The Practice Note outlines operational procedure for the Court's Technology, Engineering and Construction (TEC) List.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4371668.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Media Report - Lawyers may pay for court delays</title><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>Media Reports</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:18:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/6/10/media-report-lawyers-may-pay-for-court-delays.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4266897</guid><description><![CDATA["Lawyers could be personally liable for costs under new laws aimed at delivering quicker, cheaper and less complex justice in the Federal Court."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4266897.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Media Report - Victoria sets timetable for civil reform</title><category>Media Reports</category><category>Victoria</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:00:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/5/21/media-report-victoria-sets-timetable-for-civil-reform.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4050632</guid><description><![CDATA["Victoria will have a new civil procedure act within 12 months aimed at promoting the "just, efficient, timely and cost-effective resolution of disputes", Attorney-General Rob Hulls revealed this week."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4050632.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>CEIC 2009 - International eDiscovery, Data Protection and Privacy</title><category>Conferences</category><category>E-Discovery</category><category>USA</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:36:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/5/21/ceic-2009-international-ediscovery-data-protection-and-priva.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4046538</guid><description><![CDATA[On 17 May 2009, I was pleased to co-present on the topics of International eDiscovery and International Data Protection and Privacy at the Computer and Enterprise Investigations Conference (CEIC 2009), held in Orlando.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4046538.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Media Report - Larry Adler records 'gone by consent'</title><category>Media Reports</category><category>New South Wales</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/5/21/media-report-larry-adler-records-gone-by-consent.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:4046687</guid><description><![CDATA["Quite frankly, it is very troublesome when a solicitor engages in conduct where records are destroyed."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-4046687.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Media Report - McClelland wants cheaper, faster Federal Courts</title><category>Australia</category><category>Federal Court of Australia</category><category>Media Reports</category><dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:23:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/2009/5/7/media-report-mcclelland-wants-cheaper-faster-federal-courts.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">198571:1929777:3912851</guid><description><![CDATA["The NSW Supreme Court Rules talk about the "just, quick and cheap resolution" of disputes but this is believed to the first time it will be written into legislation. Federal Court judges will also be given additional case management powers and there will be cost penalties for those who do not comply with directions."]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.elitigation.com.au/pursuit/rss-comments-entry-3912851.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>